Turning the definition into an experiment readers can run on their own beliefs is the part I like most here. I bet most people who try it find the list of things that never changed for them is very short. And the half-truth tier reads like where most of the arguments on this site actually live. Thanks for posting!
What is truth or what is not?
Thought
Thought
Turning the definition into an experiment readers can run on their own beliefs is the part I like most here. I bet most people who try it find the list of things that never changed for them is very short. And the half-truth tier reads like where most of t
Post content
According to path of knowledge and based on my observations
See this only applies at duality level. At non-dual nothing is true or false. At level of non-dual everything is simply exsisting.
Truth - Which cannot be changed no matter what.
This measurement is required to prove of something is true or not on POK. This is how you can check your knowledge is right or false. If your knowledge is unchanged. That will be considered as truth and accept by POK.
False - which is changing.
From this you can clearly see one thing.
On POK that is why we label experiences or nadh as a maya or illusion. Because as per our measurement ideals. Nadh which is very much essence of experiences are changing. So calling nadh or experience as truth is not right according to POK...
Where else on POK experiencer is considered as truth. Because it is unchanged essence of exsistence.
You can do experiment on this measurement. If you understand this you will easily understand every teaching of path of knowledge and why it label things as illusion or truth.
Ofcourse this is at level of duality only. But at level of non-dual there is no such thing as truth or false. There is no such thing as seer or seen. There is simply exsisting. Or you can say there is simply experiencing.
These are measurement which are very helpful for seeker. When I say helpful they are truly helpful.
From this we also find out a new word. Which is in between truth and false. This is done only in POK...
This is know as half-truth. Or you can call it perspective dependent truth.
This is based on person to person. Every person have their own truth based on their own experiences and those perspectives.
So this is between the truth and false in POK. .
Thoughts
-
Shankara drew the same line long ago: real is what holds in past, present and future alike. The in-between even has an old name, mithya, neither real nor unreal. Your half-truth sits right beside it.
-
Turning the definition into an experiment readers can run on their own beliefs is the part I like most here. I bet most people who try it find the list of things that never changed for them is very short. And the half-truth tier reads like where most of the arguments on this site actually live. Thanks for posting!
-
By the unchanging test a mountain counts as true and a song counts as false. Feels like the test needs one more condition.
Related posts
-
Is trying to attain oneness useless?
Is it really not matters if you attain oneness or not?
-
HELL THAT DOESN'T KNOW IT'S BURNING
People do terrible things. Some know exactly what they are doing. Others do not. And perhaps the latter are the hardest to understand, because they can hurt, destroy, humiliate, and even ruin their…
-
Experiment on thought plane.
You should be very well clear about experiencer and experience till now if not this experiment will not be fruitful.
Public
2 conversations
5 thoughts
15 upvotes
0 downvotes
0 series
According to path of knowledge and based on my observations