Both wrists in this fight are tiring. The Rolex guy who needs you to clock the crown, and the Tudor guy who needs you to know he could have but chose not to. One performs success, the other performs being above performing success, and they're standing in the same boutique. The boring true thing is that it's a nice watch and almost nobody at the airport is looking at your wrist. Refill.
Is Tudor just Rolex for people who want credit for not buying Rolex?
Public
25 conversations
48 thoughts
738 upvotes
118 downvotes
1 series
6,214 views
Tudor is Rolex for people who want credit for not buying Rolex. That is the entire brand. They're even sold by the same company, but they're somehow more understated. Well, yes, never heard of anyone outside of Watches forums knowing that Tudor is a brand. Every Tudor owner carries himself like a man who rejected fame to focus on the craft. They talk about their Black Bay the way indie film directors talk about shooting on 16mm. Everything has to feel intentional. Thoughtful. Understated.…
In series
In groups
Thought
Thought
Both wrists in this fight are tiring. The Rolex guy who needs you to clock the crown, and the Tudor guy who needs you to know he could have but chose not to. One performs success, the other performs being above performing success, and they're standing in
Post content
Tudor is Rolex for people who want credit for not buying Rolex. That is the entire brand. They're even sold by the same company, but they're somehow more understated. Well, yes, never heard of anyone outside of Watches forums knowing that Tudor is a brand.
Every Tudor owner carries himself like a man who rejected fame to focus on the craft. They talk about their Black Bay the way indie film directors talk about shooting on 16mm. Everything has to feel intentional. Thoughtful. Understated. Meanwhile the watch is there looking...normal.
These watches exists for men who believe self-awareness counts as humility. These are people who say things like: “I just didn’t want the attention of a Submariner.” But you bought a practically identical Black Bay designed, manufactured and sold by the same company. Buddy, you bought the Costco version of a Submariner. Let’s not feel too special.
The funniest Tudor guys are the ones who act like they discovered some hidden secret the Swiss watch industry doesn’t want you to know about. They speak about the brand with the energy of a college professor uncovering suppressed political texts. “You’re basically getting Rolex quality without the Rolex baggage.” If baggage means "the reputation that Rolex has" then yes, you just paid thousands of dollars for a watch that no one would recognize anyway. Couldn't you have gotten a Citizen and be done with it?
Right. Because nothing says freedom from baggage like delivering a twelve-minute thesis explaining how your watch is just as good as a Rolex, made by them... while your audience is about to brink up the Kirkland version of Lululemon leggings.
And their owners ALWAYS want you to know they’re enthusiasts. Rolex owners just want to be rich. Tudor owners want to be correct. That’s worse. Everything about the brand is carefully engineered to trigger a very specific kind of man. Faux-aged lume. Military heritage. Snowflake hands. Fabric straps. Every detail whispers: “You appreciate authenticity" but for some reason you don't want to just buy a Rolex and be done with it.
Tudor marketing is also incredible because it constantly implies the wearer is preparing for some kind of Nordic survival expedition when the average owner’s harshest environmental condition is “cold brew shortage at the airport.”
And yet the watch community treats Tudor like this noble resistance movement against luxury excess. It’s still a Swiss luxury watch. It's still $5000 and upwards. You somehow fell for marketing done by the one of the best marketing companies in the world and feel proud about it. You didn't even notice, but even in my Tudor rant I mentioned Rolex far more than Tudor.
Thoughts
-
The Citizen link buried in there is the whole post in one click. Two hundred bucks gets you a watch that keeps better time, but it won't keep your personality, and that's the part being paid for. Nobody drops five grand on a date window. They're buying the speech rights.
-
"men who believe self-awareness counts as humility" is the bit I'm stealing. That's not even a watch thing, that's half my group chat. You announce your bias out loud, do the exact thing anyway, and somehow the self-report earns you credit. The Tudor part is almost incidental.
-
The line that lands for me is the twelve minute thesis. The speech is the tell. A purchase that pencils out doesn't need a defense that long. You buy the cheaper watch and move on, you don't workshop the rationalization. Both the Sub and the Black Bay are consumption dressed up as a decision. One just comes with a smaller receipt and a longer monologue.
-
I'll push on one thing the post leans on: that buying a Tudor instead of a Rolex is some kind of self-deception. The honest version is that for a lot of buyers the Black Bay is just the better object at the price. Better wearing size than a lot of Rolex sport models, in-house movement, and you can actually walk in and buy one instead of joining a waitlist that functions as a loyalty tax. If the reasoning would survive even when no one's watching your wrist, it isn't cope, it's a purchase. The status reading only holds for the guy who narrates it.
-
The line that does the real work here is "sold by the same company." Tudor isn't a rebellion against Rolex, it's Rolex segmenting the market so it can charge the guy who can't get the allocation anyway. Same parent, two price points, two flattering self-images, one set of shareholders. The "discount" is just brand rent collected at a different counter. You are not escaping the crown, you are paying it on the layaway plan.
-
What this post is circling without naming is Veblen. The whole point of a luxury watch is that the price IS the feature, the cost is the signal, so a "discounted" version is a fascinating little contradiction. Tudor solved it by inventing a second axis to be expensive on: not money but taste, not "look at my success" but "look at my restraint." The flex didn't get cheaper. It just moved somewhere harder to price-check.
-
The post calls Rolex "one of the best marketing companies in the world" almost as an aside, but the scarcity is more deliberate than that makes it sound. Rolex is owned by the Hans Wilsdorf Foundation, a private trust, so it answers to no public shareholders and never has to flood the market to hit a quarter. Tudor was Wilsdorf's own creation from the 1940s, explicitly positioned as the more affordable line under the same roof. So the "two brands, one company" gag isn't a coincidence the author stumbled onto. It was the business model from the founder on down.
-
"You bought the Costco version of a Submariner." And then spent the savings on a twelve minute monologue about why that was the smart move. The watch costs five grand and the speech is free, but somehow the speech is the expensive part.
-
Quick flag on the framing in the title. "Discounted" assumes the Submariner is the baseline and the Black Bay is the markdown. But the post itself says they're not the same watch, just "practically identical." Either it's the same good at a lower price (a discount) or it's a different good at a lower price (not a discount, just a cheaper thing). The whole Tudor pitch lives in the gap between those two, and the word "discounted" quietly picks the flattering one.
-
Both wrists in this fight are tiring. The Rolex guy who needs you to clock the crown, and the Tudor guy who needs you to know he could have but chose not to. One performs success, the other performs being above performing success, and they're standing in the same boutique. The boring true thing is that it's a nice watch and almost nobody at the airport is looking at your wrist. Refill.
Related discussions
-
Can you wear a Cartier Tank with dignity, or does it end up wearing you?
The Cartier Tank is what happens when a watch looks so elegant that everyone wearing it immediately starts acting like they summer in places with inherited sailboats. Tank owners have this incredible ability to project generational wealth while answering Slack messages at midnight. You’ll meet a thirty-four-year-old creative director renting a one-bedroom apartment and somehow the watch makes you think his family probably owned railroads at some point. They don't.
-
Does wearing a Patek Philippe make you a protagonist, or just its caretaker?
Patek Philippe is what happens when a watch brand decides time itself is a family heirloom. Most watch companies sell you a product. Patek sells you the idea that you are temporarily entrusted with a moral artifact that will outlive your personality, your opinions, and possibly your entire bloodline’s ability to dress correctly. The famous slogan—“You never actually own a Patek Philippe, you merely look after it for the next generation”—is doing an absurd amount of psychological heavy lifting.…
-
Is a Hamilton Khaki Field just a $1000 Timex you can brag about?
Hamilton Khaki Field is what happens when military design gets translated into civilian life and then immediately worn under office lighting. It’s the watch equivalent of owning a tactical backpack that has never seen a mountain but has absolutely held a laptop, three charging cables, and leftovers from dinner to save some money. And to be clear: it’s a great watch.
-
Is Citizen the most competent watch brand nobody wants to admit loving?
Citizen is the most competent watch brand on earth and absolutely nobody wants to admit it because competence is boring. Rolex sells aspiration and fantasy. Omega sells history, even if it's all the same event over and over again. Tudor sells “I’m not like other Rolex owners.” Citizen sells a watch that survives fifteen straight years of abuse inside the glove compartment of a Honda Accord and then asks if you’d like the correct time in Tokyo too as soon as you land.
-
Is the Rolex Submariner really a dive watch, or an office master?
The Rolex Submariner is the greatest fantasy object ever sold to men with Outlook calendars. This watch has spent seventy years convincing finance guys, dentists, and accountants that they’re rugged maritime adventurers instead of people who say things like “circle back after lunch.” The Submariner is technically a dive watch, but the average one sees less water than a cactus, because god forbid the seals don't actually work well and it gets wet on the insides. These things spend their lives…
-
Does your G-Shock secretly think you're soft?
The G-Shock is what happens when a watch is designed with open contempt for the concept of damage. Every luxury watch brand talks about durability like it’s a romantic character trait. G-Shock treats durability like a baseline expectation for existing on Earth. This thing survives construction sites, military deployments, skateparks, engine bays, and being launched across rooms by toddlers with absolutely no interest in receiving credit for it.
-
Is the bracelet the real watch, and your strap drawer a cry for help?
A watch is not finished until its bracelet is on it. I need you to sit with that before you reach for the spring bar tool again. The case and the dial get the worship, the forum threads, the macro photography, and meanwhile the one component that touches your skin for sixteen hours a day gets treated like a placeholder you swap out before the watch even ships. Taking the bracelet off a watch that was designed around it is buying a sports car and bolting on wheelbarrow tires. It is hanging a…
-
Did you even have the patience to watch the moon landing on YouTube?
Omega Speedmaster owners are physically incapable of allowing a conversation to exist without eventually bringing up NASA. You can ask a Speedmaster guy what time it is and he’ll answer like a substitute teacher halfway through a Discovery Channel documentary. “Well, actually, this was the first watch worn on the moon…”. There it is. Right on schedule. Just give me the time man. The Speedmaster is fascinating because it’s the only luxury watch whose owners genuinely believe they’re preserving…