Loading…

Rolex, again - This time discounted

infected_mushroom
Public 10 conversations 40 arguments 402 agrees 62 disagrees 1 series 1,671 views

Tudor is Rolex for people who want credit for not buying Rolex. That is the entire brand. They're even sold by the same company, but they're somehow more understated. Well, yes, never heard of anyone outside of Watches forums knowing that Tudor is a brand. Every Tudor owner carries himself like a man who rejected fame to focus on the craft. They talk about their Black Bay the way indie film directors talk about shooting on 16mm. Everything has to feel intentional. Thoughtful. Understated.…

In series

Discussion content

Tudor is Rolex for people who want credit for not buying Rolex. That is the entire brand. They're even sold by the same company, but they're somehow more understated. Well, yes, never heard of anyone outside of Watches forums knowing that Tudor is a brand.

Every Tudor owner carries himself like a man who rejected fame to focus on the craft. They talk about their Black Bay the way indie film directors talk about shooting on 16mm. Everything has to feel intentional. Thoughtful. Understated. Meanwhile the watch is there looking...normal.

These watches exists for men who believe self-awareness counts as humility. These are people who say things like: “I just didn’t want the attention of a Submariner.” But you bought a practically identical Black Bay designed, manufactured and sold by the same company. Buddy, you bought the Costco version of a Submariner. Let’s not feel too special.

null
It does feel good

The funniest Tudor guys are the ones who act like they discovered some hidden secret the Swiss watch industry doesn’t want you to know about. They speak about the brand with the energy of a college professor uncovering suppressed political texts. “You’re basically getting Rolex quality without the Rolex baggage.” If baggage means "the reputation that Rolex has" then yes, you just paid thousands of dollars for a watch that no one would recognize anyway. Couldn't you have gotten a Citizen and be done with it?

Right. Because nothing says freedom from baggage like delivering a twelve-minute thesis explaining how your watch is just as good as a Rolex, made by them... while your audience is about to brink up the Kirkland version of Lululemon leggings.

And their owners ALWAYS want you to know they’re enthusiasts. Rolex owners just want to be rich. Tudor owners want to be correct. That’s worse. Everything about the brand is carefully engineered to trigger a very specific kind of man. Faux-aged lume. Military heritage. Snowflake hands. Fabric straps. Every detail whispers: “You appreciate authenticity" but for some reason you don't want to just buy a Rolex and be done with it.

Tudor marketing is also incredible because it constantly implies the wearer is preparing for some kind of Nordic survival expedition when the average owner’s harshest environmental condition is “cold brew shortage at the airport.”

And yet the watch community treats Tudor like this noble resistance movement against luxury excess. It’s still a Swiss luxury watch. It's still $5000 and upwards. You somehow fell for marketing done by the one of the best marketing companies in the world and feel proud about it. You didn't even notice, but even in my Tudor rant I mentioned Rolex far more than Tudor.

null
Yes, I also went through this. This rant was more self-reflection than anything else...