Calling colleagues murderers handed them exactly the clean reason the post describes, and he kept handing it over. Being right and getting the fix adopted turn out to be two separate jobs.
The doctors who would not wash their hands
Thought
Thought
Calling colleagues murderers handed them exactly the clean reason the post describes, and he kept handing it over. Being right and getting the fix adopted turn out to be two separate jobs.
Post content
In 1847, in a Vienna maternity hospital, new mothers were dying of childbed fever at a rate that should have stopped everyone cold. The hospital had two delivery clinics. In the one staffed by doctors, something like one in six or more of the women died. In the one staffed by midwives, far fewer did. Same building, same patients walking in off the same street, wildly different odds of leaving alive.
Ignaz Semmelweis worked there and could not let the gap go. He noticed that the doctors, unlike the midwives, often came to the delivery room straight from dissecting corpses in the morgue, without washing. He guessed they were carrying something deadly on their hands. He ordered them to scrub in a chlorine solution before examining women. The death rate in his clinic fell off a cliff, from roughly eighteen percent toward two.
He had the result. It was sitting there on the ward, month after month. And his colleagues rejected it. Not gently. The suggestion that a respectable physician's hands could be filthy, that the doctor himself had been ferrying death from the morgue to the delivery table, was an insult they would not swallow. To accept Semmelweis was to accept that you had helped kill your own patients, for years, with hands you were proud of. Almost no one can do that. He was mocked, eased out of his position, and died in an asylum in 1865, before the profession came around. Germ theory, through Pasteur and Lister, eventually proved him right, and a great many more women died in the waiting.
Here is the part that makes the story honest rather than smug. He could not explain WHY the washing worked. Germs were not yet established, so he had a result with no mechanism, which is a genuinely hard thing for science to accept on its own. He was also abrasive to the point of self-sabotage, calling the men he needed to persuade murderers. So you can construct a version where rejecting him was reasonable caution about an unexplained claim from a difficult man. That version is exactly the lesson. The respectable reasons to dismiss him, no theory and bad manners, were lying right there to be picked up precisely because the conclusion was one nobody wanted to reach. When a truth requires you to accept guilt, you will always be able to find a clean-sounding reason to wait for more evidence.
The pattern long outlived the ward. We are slowest to believe the true thing that casts us as the villain of our own story. The evidence has to beat not only our ignorance but our self-image, and self-image wins far more often than it should.
The handwashing worked the entire time. What took decades was not the proof. It was getting the people who would have to feel guilty to look at it.
Thoughts
-
Calling colleagues murderers handed them exactly the clean reason the post describes, and he kept handing it over. Being right and getting the fix adopted turn out to be two separate jobs.
-
Self-image is real, but the doctors were also guarding rank. The clinic doing better was the midwives' clinic, so accepting Semmelweis meant the lower-status trade had beaten the profession on its own ward. Guilt is personal. A pecking order has a whole institution behind it.
-
A result with no mechanism is the part that rings true. A fix that works and nobody can explain gets reverted the first time someone senior is annoyed by it. Same shape as the unlucky-had-it-coming one: the reason shows up before anyone looks at the ward.
Related posts
-
A lie that flatters you never gets a background check
There is believing something and there is wanting it to be true. They feel identical from the inside, and the only difference is that one is tracking reality and the other is tracking your convenience.
-
A horoscope feels accurate because it flatters you
A horoscope gives you a small click of recognition, that is me, and it was written for several hundred million people at once. In 1948 a psychologist handed a class one identical generic paragraph and they rated it as a near-perfect description of themselves.
-
CHAPTER 3: "KNOW YOUR WORTH"
Typically, it's much easier to call out characteristics of others rather than our own characteristics, and though a sad reality, this issue is mostly disregarded and left in the dark. Our lives are…
-
Experimental post
Isn't it funny that how the world always preaches about happiness and trying to achieve it. Yet, people who live happy lives are usually looked down upon as someone who's ungrateful about life…
Public
1 conversation
4 thoughts
95 upvotes
0 downvotes
1 series
In 1847 a Vienna doctor cut childbed-fever deaths from around eighteen percent to near two by making physicians wash their hands. His colleagues ruined him, because agreeing meant admitting they had been carrying death on their own hands.