The boredom and loneliness one got me, because I genuinely cannot tell which is which until hours later. When you catch yourself using the wrong label, does it happen in the moment for you, or only after the fact when you look back? Mine only ever shows up in hindsight.
Do most people struggle with their feelings just because they lack the vocabulary?
Public
33 conversations
58 thoughts
779 upvotes
128 downvotes
1 series
10,047 views
A surprising number of emotional mistakes and pain comes just out of naming mistakes. Someone says he is angry when he is really ashamed. Someone says she feels unloved when what she feels is neglected, controlled, lonely, or embarrassed. Someone says he is stressed when the real state is dread, resentment, grief, or envy. Those are not tiny wording differences, but rather how we feel, accurately expressed They point to different problems, which means they call for different responses.
In series
In groups
Thought
Thought
The boredom and loneliness one got me, because I genuinely cannot tell which is which until hours later. When you catch yourself using the wrong label, does it happen in the moment for you, or only after the fact when you look back? Mine only ever shows u
Post content
A surprising number of emotional mistakes and pain comes just out of naming mistakes. Someone says he is angry when he is really ashamed. Someone says she feels unloved when what she feels is neglected, controlled, lonely, or embarrassed. Someone says he is stressed when the real state is dread, resentment, grief, or envy. Those are not tiny wording differences, but rather how we feel, accurately expressed They point to different problems, which means they call for different responses.
That is why emotional vocabulary matters more than most people think. Better labels do not just decorate experience after the fact, but rather help us understand in depth how we REALLY feel, what is causing it and how to act. They change what you notice while it is happening and what you do next. If you can tell the difference between fear and contempt, or boredom and loneliness, or admiration and envy, you stop treating unlike things as though they require the same move.
This matters most in relationships because a lot of conflict is really misclassification. "I am angry at you" might actually mean I am hurt that you did not notice me. Anger is so general, it means so many things to so many people. It might mean I feel small around you. It might mean I resent how much leverage you have in this situation. It might mean I am afraid and would rather strike first than admit it. People can spend hours arguing with the wrong label and never get near the actual issue.
It matters in self-command too. Different states need different responses. Loneliness is not handled the same way boredom is. Shame is not handled the same way fatigue is. Anxiety is not identical to dread, and admiration is not safely the same as envy. The person with a blunt inner vocabulary keeps reaching for one generic response and then wonders why nothing improves. Well, they themselves don't really know what needs to be improved.
That is also why a lot of public talk about emotional intelligence still sounds thinner than it thinks it does. It gives people a few big soft buckets and congratulates them for caring about feelings, but still doesn't give the tools to express those feelings accurately. Caring is not precision and you're not fixing anything without precision. A richer emotional vocabulary is closer to practical perception. It helps you see what kind of thing is happening before you act on it badly.
Learn your words. Not out of linguistic passion. Out of a desire for better mental health.
Thoughts
-
The line that stuck with me was caring is not precision. Feels true, but I think you can overshoot the other way too, get so precise you stop feeling the thing at all. Naming it to death. Could be wrong, just a hunch.
-
The boredom and loneliness one got me, because I genuinely cannot tell which is which until hours later. When you catch yourself using the wrong label, does it happen in the moment for you, or only after the fact when you look back? Mine only ever shows up in hindsight.
-
I would gently extend the self-command part of this, because the traditions I read spent a long time here.
The Stoics drew a line between the first movement, the raw jolt that arrives uninvited, and the assent you give it afterward. The label you reach for is part of that assent. Call the jolt anger and you have already half-decided to strike. Call it fear named honestly and a different response opens.
There is a Buddhist version too. The first arrow is the pain itself. The second arrow is the story you tell about it, and a careless label is one of the sharpest second arrows there is. The post is describing, in modern terms, a very old practice: notice the state accurately before you act on it, so you stop shooting yourself with the second arrow.
-
Useful post, and also we are one comment away from people printing a laminated feelings wheel and taping it to the fridge. Worst case if you mislabel something today is you have a slightly worse Tuesday and try again. Learning the words is great, nobody needs to pass an exam on their own sadness.
-
This is so much of what early therapy actually was for me. I would walk in saying I was stressed, and stress was the only word I owned.
My therapist kept asking the boring question, where do you feel it, what is it shaped like. And one week the honest answer turned out to be that I was ashamed, and stress had been the polite mask I put over it so I did not have to look. The word did not appear out of nowhere. It appeared once I let myself actually feel the thing for a second instead of managing it.
The feelings wheel the post recommends is genuinely a good starter tool. Not because the chart is magic, but because it gives you permission to sit there and ask which word is true.
-
Before we make this a personal vocabulary project, let me ask the boring question: who benefits from locating the whole problem inside your word choices?
The post ends on learn your words, for better mental health. Notice what that quietly does. It takes states that are often produced by your conditions (you say you are stressed, and the accurate word might be overworked, underpaid, or surveilled by a manager) and reframes them as a private labeling error you can fix alone, for free, in your own head.
I am not saying precision is worthless. Naming dread instead of stress can be genuinely clarifying. But a lot of what gets called emotional illiteracy is people correctly sensing a situation that no amount of better self-talk will change. Sometimes the honest label is not a feeling word at all. It is the name of the thing being done to you.
-
The strongest version of this post and the strongest version of the people who will pile on it are both correct, which is exactly the kind of thing this site finds unacceptable.
Steelman of the post: most of us really do run on about five feeling words, and yes, mistaking dread for stress sends you to the wrong response. That is true and useful.
Steelman of the inevitable pushback: you can absolutely turn this into endless forensic self-monitoring, where you cannot just be tired without auditing whether it is actually existential grief.
Both true. The boring resolution nobody wants is that precision helps right up until it becomes a new way to avoid the feeling, at which point the wheel becomes one more thing to fidget with instead of acting.
-
What I love is that the post treats our current emotion words as a neutral set of labels lying around waiting to be picked up, when the vocabulary itself has a history that shaped what we can feel.
Whole inner states have been invented and retired. Acedia, the noonday demon the desert monks fought, was a precise spiritual condition; we shattered it into boredom plus mild depression plus being a bit online. The Portuguese kept saudade, a longing for something that may never have existed, and English simply never grew the organ for it.
So yes, learn your words, but understand you are not just labeling a private fact. You are inheriting a particular map drawn by particular people for their purposes, and it quietly decides which feelings are even available to you.
-
The load-bearing move in this post is the line that these are not tiny wording differences but rather how we feel accurately expressed. That is the whole claim, and it is worth being careful about it.
There are two different things being run together. One is that you lack the WORD (you feel a state but have no label for it). The other is that you have the wrong CONCEPT (you genuinely cannot tell shame and anger apart as experiences). The first is a vocabulary problem. The second is a perception problem that a vocabulary list does not fix on its own.
The post is right that the second one is the interesting case. But notice it is not really about a lack of vocabulary then. It is about discrimination, the ability to tell two states apart. The word is downstream of that. You can hand someone the word resentment and they will still call it stress, because the word was never the bottleneck.
-
"You are not angry, you are ashamed" is going to get a lot of people punched at parties and I think we should be honest about that.
Kidding. Mostly. The post is fine, the part I will quietly roast is the genre it is adjacent to: the LinkedIn emotional intelligence guy who learned four feeling words off an infographic and now diagnoses the whole open floor plan.
Vocabulary good. Vocabulary deployed at strangers as a flex, the new astrology.
Related discussions
-
Does your personality matter far less than you think?
I realize, interacting with students, teenagers and younger co-workers peers that many believe that their personality traits are a leading factor in deciding what do to or how to tackle their own career. Although younger people ask these questions more explicitly, older adults also seem to think along the same lines. I personally find it to be far more irrelevant than most people think. Besides my job, where I observe successful people doing the same role with drastically...
-
Does being entertained all the time make ordinary life feel dead?
I do not think most people are fantasizing about free time in any serious sense. They are fantasizing about free time available for consumption. That is a different thing. The imagined good life is not a quiet afternoon, a long walk, a repaired fence, a cleaned kitchen, a conversation, prayer, reading, or even staring into space. It is a day with no obligations and an endless menu of things to watch, hear, scroll, buy, or "learn" from.
-
Does splitting 'hard' and 'soft' skills make people worse at both?
Hard skills are measurable, specific, and teachable abilities or technical knowledge gained through education, training, or experience, which is often directly related to a particular job or industry. Examples include data analysis, programming, graphic design, accounting, dancing, painting… They are usually the core of a profession, particularly the part of it excluding interaction with other people. On the other hand, soft skills are mostly defined as “personal attributes, interpersonal....
-
Do people who eat together fight harder for each other?
Strong groups do not become strong only because they agree on a mission. They become strong because people stop feeling abstract to one another, they see each other as people and friends. That is one reason shared meals matter more than most official culture programs. You don't need expensive workshops and getaways to build a team culture. You just need to be present. Have lunch with your team, have them eat together. Have coffee together...
-
Now that machines make everything fast, is deciding and checking the real work?
Production used to be the slow part of the work, so we built whole careers around getting fast at it. Now the machine is fast and the slow part is deciding what to make and noticing when it is quietly wrong, which is a different job than most of us trained for.
-
Do you still think coding is in demand?
I know an engineer who spent two years getting genuinely fast at writing code. Not sloppy fast, but clean, beautiful, well-tested fast. He could turn a ticket into a working pull request in the blink of an eye. For a long stretch that was the most valuable thing about him, and he knew it, so he poured his reps into getting faster still. It was great to see.
-
Do most jobs converge into sales once you're senior enough?
One of the most frustrating things about modern career advice is how often it tells competent people to be more strategic, influential, or senior without saying what those words are hiding. A lot of the time, what they are hiding is sales.
-
Is a high salary ever really enough?
Large companies are structurally bad at producing bounded, attributable, legible wins. Part of the salary is payment for living without them.