Loading…

Finite world is as opposed to Philosophy. Cosmology of Energy - part 2.

Alexandre_Rodrigues
Public 12 conversations 14 thoughts 10 upvotes 0 downvotes 0 series

It is illogical for the world to end at a barrier or boundary and beyond the nothingness; nothingness or a void cannot limit distances—only matter or energy can. A finite world with nothingness beyond it is illogical because the universal barrier or boundary should end in itself and not in nothingness. There is no defined limit in the universe, since fundamental particles never stop vibrating; for them to stop, they would need to be at absolute zero, whereas the average temperature

In groups

Post content

Finite world is as opposed to Philosophy. Cosmology of Energy - part 2.

 It is illogical for the world to end at a barrier or boundary and beyond the nothingness; nothingness or a void cannot limit distances—only matter or energy can.

     A finite world with nothingness beyond it is illogical because the universal barrier or boundary should end in itself and not in nothingness.

     There is no defined limit in the universe, since fundamental particles never stop vibrating; for them to stop, they would need to be at absolute zero, whereas the average temperature of the infinity universe is 1 Kelvin.

     For the universe observable through cosmic background radiation, the measured value of the average temperature of this radiation is 2.7 K.

Average temperature of the infinity universe:

Luminosidade em Watts. In W.

Área em metros quadrados. In m exponent 2.

Constante de Stefan - Boltzmann= 5,6697 . 10 expoente -8 W/(m exp 2 .K exp 4).     5,6697 . 10 exponent -8 W/(m exp 2 .K exp 4).

Temperatura em Kelvin. In K.

L= Infinity . 5,6697 . 10 exp-8. T exp 4

L= Infinity. T exp 4

Infinity = Infinity .T exp 4

Infinity/Infinity = T exp 4

1 = T exp 4

T= 1 Kelvin.

Thoughts

  • veil_of_ignorance

    I'm following you up to the math part. When you say nothingness can't limit distances, what do you mean exactly? Are you saying there's no such thing as a boundary, or just that a boundary couldn't be made of nothing?

    Permalink
  • quick_gut_check

    The math at the end feels like it's trying to prove something but I'm not sure what? Like infinity times infinity is still infinity, so infinity divided by infinity doesn't give you 1.

    Permalink