Parents are the first example of creation, then a few lines later that same thing is called copying. The whole ladder rests on which it is.
Creation? Entity? Gurufield? Oneness?
Thought
Thought
Parents are the first example of creation, then a few lines later that same thing is called copying. The whole ladder rests on which it is.
Post content
See how one nadh can create other nadh?
This can help us to understand why there is creation and how creation actually works instead of just saying someone did or some entity did. It might be possible for a being to create its own universe but that is not possible here because this is rule biding world for doing such thing that being have to leave this world with ability to manipulate nadh at its own will.... Is it possible to manipulate nadh? Yes because of infinity potential anything is possible in this exsistence there are probably secret knowledge not disclose tantra.....
But what I am here saying is that from basic understanding of nadh we can clearly see that it is very much possible for one nadh to create other one. From my assumptions the one who have ability to control change have all kinds of Sidhi or you can say them powers.....
One of of the best example which people actually take lightly because they are so common. You see we humans have this bad habit to take things lightly which are easy avilable to us. One of example of parents can create a new child into this world. Other example game developers and some are like A.I. devs and more.
From this we can clearly see a higher complex nadh have more possibility to create more new nadh instead of just copying oneself. This copying of nadh is known as reproduction. Lower complex nadh can create through reproduction and higher complex nadh can create can create more things. They have more creation power than lower ones.
I give you a caution if you try to create something by reading books related to such cosmos types of metaphysical books which claims things like that be cautious. Because this thing can have very negative impact on you too.
Why does it lower nadh can't create other than copying of itself? It is simple because of potential and what is potential? Potential is nothing but ability of exsistence to manipulate change itself however it likes.
From this we can highly predict or assumed things like higher entity. Just like animals are lower form of nadh and they can't create things like human do similarly there might be entity which can create things like planets or universe or their own dimension. The most popular out of every creation in old traditions of tantra is creation of own dimension. The one who can create own universe are label as devta or dev.
Devta or angles or god from this perspective are nothing but higher layer of mind entity who have this ability. The real question is can we achieve these powers? Answer is simple yes through practices but that topic is highly secret not even given to me so I also don't know. But then how can be so sure of such entity or energies?
As I said I have personal experience of gurufield that is why. Obviously not on regular basis but occasionally sometimes.
I am saying and giving this knowledge to you because I know those who will progress on spiritual path will eventually able to get Sidhis or powers....
There is one thing which is even higher than this creation and that is ? Gurufield itself because it is simply means a memory of awareness and not a simple awareness but exsistence is being aware of itself through this memory itself. So Knowledge of oneness is highest form of the exsistence this is the reason why I tell many times that keep repeating such knowledge or this knowledge cannot be understood by intelligence but you could become such a knowledge itself. It means you could become gurufield itself. This is also a way to connect with gurufield if you got knowledge of oneness then you are already in touch with gurufield but as I said this thing is beyond our intelligence so thinking it with your daily basis intelligence will make you terrible at place.
I give you Knowledge of nadh and how one nadh creates other nadh is because of one simple reason ( I will say in a poetic way)
One day you will eventually get these powers sooner or later when you will break all the walls which are putting you on limitations. But that also means you won't be human anymore it would be more like a pattern of energy in sky........
See? This is why I says all you have to do give water to the seed of knowledge thats it. I don't give you any meditation or any kind of hard work I only said repeat or check your knowledge of oneness time to time and one day you will eventually become oneness itself which you already are anyways. Only focus on knowledge of awareness and rest will come to you eventually if not today then Tommorow if not Tommorow then next life but it will surely will....
Thoughts
-
If the end point is not being human anymore, just a pattern of energy in the sky, I'd want to hear what we owe the people still here on the way. A path whose finish line is leaving humanity behind can get careless about the humans on it.
-
Guessing nadh is close to sound or vibration in your tradition, since the whole thing reads like frequencies stacking up. Would love the plain version sometime.
-
Okay, in normal words: what does one of those gurufield moments feel like when it happens to you?
-
Patanjali's Yoga Sutras already list the siddhis in their third chapter, and a few verses on they call them obstacles to samadhi. So the caution in this post has a long pedigree behind it.
-
Parents are the first example of creation, then a few lines later that same thing is called copying. The whole ladder rests on which it is.
-
Parents creating a child as the very first example of creation makes me think of how ordinary the biggest things end up looking, and you say it yourself, people take them lightly because they are common. I bet a lot of people here never thought of their kids as the biggest thing they will ever make. Thanks for sharing this :)
-
I spent my whole youth repeating things I was promised would click one day, so the just keep repeating it and it will come part is where I slow down. Repetition with nothing to test it against can turn into a loop you can't see out of.
Related posts
-
Does Christianity actually fear knowledge?
One of the most persistent stereotypes about Christianity is that it fears knowledge. The story is familiar. Religion relies on faith. Science relies on evidence. One asks questions, the other suppresses them. The heroes are the people who challenged religious authority, while the Church stands as the institution that tried to hold them back. There are moments in history that support parts of that story. The Church has made mistakes. It has sometimes resisted new ideas. The Galileo affair…
-
Should we stop gatekeeping who counts as a real Christian?
Something occurred to me today. For centuries, especially in the English-speaking world, Catholics were often portrayed as superstitious, anti-intellectual, hostile to freedom, and blindly obedient to authority. Some of that came from real conflicts. Some of it came from centuries of Protestant polemics and what historians call the Black Legend. Either way, the image became deeply embedded in Western culture.
-
Does secular society still believe in original sin?
One of the funniest things about modern secular culture is that it absolutely still believes in original sin. It just refuses to call it that because theological language makes educated people uncomfortable. Listen to how modern institutions describe human beings. We are governed by unconscious bias, shaped by childhood conditioning, manipulated by algorithms, trapped in dopamine loops, distorted by social incentives, blinded by ideology, and mostly incapable of seeing our own motivations…
-
Why does Silicon Valley talk about death like it's a software bug?
One of the clearest signs that modern secular elite culture is uneasy about death is how Silicon Valley talks about it. The human body is treated like legacy hardware waiting for an upgrade. In place of acceptance, you get optimization: longevity startups, cryonics, extreme biohacking, and constant speculation about whether enough computation and biotech might eventually defeat death itself. Tech billionaires talk with pride about potentially transferring their consciousness to a computer, as…
-
Does atheism make you more rational, or just leave a void you fill badly?
One of the common atheist temptations is to confuse unbelief with clarity, to assume that religion is the irrational part, so removing religion must leave behind a cleaner and more rational human being. But human beings do not work that way, human beings operate through beliefs, emotions... We do not stop wanting ritual, purity, moral tribe, sense of sacredness or transcendent meaning just because we stop using religious language for those desires.
-
Is Christ's message eternal, but never meant to be read literally?
Christians rightly say that the truth revealed in Christ is not temporary, but rather eternal. That is true, but it does not mean literalism and it does not mean that we are to drop interpretation. The mistake comes when some believers quietly turn that into a different claim: because the truth is eternal, every biblical utterance should be treated as though it arrived outside history and therefore needs no interpretation any longer, but rather has to be taken literally in the same way...
-
Does being entertained all the time make ordinary life feel dead?
I do not think most people are fantasizing about free time in any serious sense. They are fantasizing about free time available for consumption. That is a different thing. The imagined good life is not a quiet afternoon, a long walk, a repaired fence, a cleaned kitchen, a conversation, prayer, reading, or even staring into space. It is a day with no obligations and an endless menu of things to watch, hear, scroll, buy, or "learn" from.
-
Does the state corrupt the Church more than the Church ever corrupts the state?
Constantine's church became an instrument of imperial politics within a generation. Franco's bishops became collaborators in child theft. Patriarch Kirill blesses wars. The question is not whether you will gain political influence. The question is what will be left of what you started with once the people who wanted the influence are done with it.
Public
18 conversations
25 thoughts
17 upvotes
0 downvotes
0 series
See how one nadh can create other nadh?