Skip to content
Loading…

My first take on the challenges in democracy.

hello
Thought

Thought

veil_of_ignorance

You've spotted a real tension: a democracy can promise political equality while leaving economic and social power staggeringly unequal. But is the problem that leaders choose not to uproot hierarchies, or that dismantling entrenched systems is harder than

You've spotted a real tension: a democracy can promise political equality while leaving economic and social power staggeringly unequal. But is the problem that leaders choose not to uproot hierarchies, or that dismantling entrenched systems is harder than a voting choice? Those suggest very different fixes. Do you think a majority voting against division is enough, or does economic power insulate itself from the ballot?

Post content

The challenge of social and economical equality in a democratic society.

Even as a country progresses as a democratic nation, one of the major challenges to its establishment comes from the fact that democracy endorses a type of equality that appears to be seen only in the days of election - political. In democratic society, it is said that people are the source of power but people itself is divided on economic and social lines. By seeing the fact that much of the wealth of the nation is with some ultra-rich people can make people angry but it is the result of the social hierarchies that humans made for the domination of one class, caste and religion over the other. Democracy functions of the consensuses, discourses and association within the people but until democratic leaders at the center doesn't uproot all types of economical and social hierarchies and there is no stop in the people for voting a leader that has contributed more to the division of the society than unification then, the day we achieve social and economical equality in democracy is too far away.

Thoughts

  • veil_of_ignorance

    You've spotted a real tension: a democracy can promise political equality while leaving economic and social power staggeringly unequal. But is the problem that leaders choose not to uproot hierarchies, or that dismantling entrenched systems is harder than a voting choice? Those suggest very different fixes. Do you think a majority voting against division is enough, or does economic power insulate itself from the ballot?

    Permalink

Related posts

  • Luck, merit, or probability?

    It's surreal how capitalism really won in this messed up country. Now everything is based on "ah, but I'm doing just fine..."

  • Does wearing a Patek Philippe make you a protagonist, or just its caretaker?

    Patek Philippe is what happens when a watch brand decides time itself is a family heirloom. Most watch companies sell you a product. Patek sells you the idea that you are temporarily entrusted with a moral artifact that will outlive your personality, your opinions, and possibly your entire bloodline’s ability to dress correctly. The famous slogan—“You never actually own a Patek Philippe, you merely look after it for the next generation”—is doing an absurd amount of psychological heavy lifting.…

  • Did you even have the patience to watch the moon landing on YouTube?

    Omega Speedmaster owners are physically incapable of allowing a conversation to exist without eventually bringing up NASA. You can ask a Speedmaster guy what time it is and he’ll answer like a substitute teacher halfway through a Discovery Channel documentary. “Well, actually, this was the first watch worn on the moon…”. There it is. Right on schedule. Just give me the time man. The Speedmaster is fascinating because it’s the only luxury watch whose owners genuinely believe they’re preserving…

  • Does anyone actually care about your watch?

    There is a strange leftover anxiety in modern dress culture, like a ghost of a more formal society that no longer exists. We all still behave as if every visible detail is being quietly graded. The watch is one of the clearest examples of this illusion. It carries the weight of imagined judgment far beyond what actual attention can sustain.

  • Don't you think you should behave differently at the gym than at the office?

    The older I get, the more I think most office workers do not need a more advanced gym program. They need to stop behaving like office workers for one hour. I am an office worker, but I feel I'm smarter about it. Let's go for big brain time Look, you sit all day at work. Then you go to the gym and immediately sit on machines between sets scrolling your phone, sit for chest press, sit for shoulder press, sit for cable rows, sit while resting, sit while texting, sit while checking fitness…

  • Should politicians actually get paid more?

    People like the idea of cheap politics because it feels morally clean. If politicians are underpaid, the thinking goes, they must be serving for noble reasons. If the salary is modest, corruption must have less room to grow. It is an attractive fantasy and a bad way to design a state. In fact, is an elitist way and it leads to government by the rich, who can afford it.

  • Does being entertained all the time make ordinary life feel dead?

    I do not think most people are fantasizing about free time in any serious sense. They are fantasizing about free time available for consumption. That is a different thing. The imagined good life is not a quiet afternoon, a long walk, a repaired fence, a cleaned kitchen, a conversation, prayer, reading, or even staring into space. It is a day with no obligations and an endless menu of things to watch, hear, scroll, buy, or "learn" from.

  • THE GRANDFATHER'S SPEAKER AND LINUX

    THE GRANDFATHER'S SPEAKER AND LINUX: THE ANTIDOTE TO THE RELIGION OF THE ALGORITHM

Public 2 conversations 3 thoughts 4 upvotes 0 downvotes 0 series

I have been thinking about the challenges in democracy and this is what I have come with.

In groups