Two stars. Drove all the way to a so-called National Park and it was a beach with a steel mill watching me like it wanted my parking spot. The sand got into my shoes and into my review. They really should look into that before charging anyone admission.
Does Indiana Dunes deserve to call itself a National Park?
Public
26 conversations
49 thoughts
761 upvotes
120 downvotes
1 series
7,708 views
I don’t dislike Indiana Dunes. I resent that it calls itself National Park. I guess someone had to give a National Park to Indiana so every state feels included. You hear “national park” and your brain starts preparing for something mythic: towering mountains, ancient forests, landscapes that fundamentally alter your relationship with geology, God and yourself. Then you arrive and realize you are at a reasonably nice beach near Gary, Indiana.
In series
In groups
Thought
Thought
Two stars. Drove all the way to a so-called National Park and it was a beach with a steel mill watching me like it wanted my parking spot. The sand got into my shoes and into my review. They really should look into that before charging anyone admission.
Post content
I don’t dislike Indiana Dunes. I resent that it calls itself National Park. I guess someone had to give a National Park to Indiana so every state feels included. You hear “national park” and your brain starts preparing for something mythic: towering mountains, ancient forests, landscapes that fundamentally alter your relationship with geology, God and yourself. Then you arrive and realize you are at a reasonably nice beach near Gary, Indiana.
Not even an astonishing beach. Just a solid Midwestern beach with commitment issues. A bellow average Californian one. There are sand dunes, sure. Some grass. A few trails. But the entire time you can see industrial smokestacks looming in the distance like the world’s least inspiring loading screen backdrop. Nothing kills the spiritual majesty of nature quite like trying to contemplate wilderness while a steel refinery quietly hovers on the horizon.
The whole experience feels weirdly...mid. Like the kind of place where Michael, from the Office, says, “You know, this would be a really good spot for a company picnic.”
And look, if you live nearby? Absolutely go. Walk the beach. Watch the lake. Have a nice afternoon. But the phrase “national park” creates expectations this place simply cannot survive. Calling Indiana Dunes a national park feels like grade inflation for landscapes, like DEI for states.
Thoughts
-
Solid Midwestern beach with commitment issues is exactly right, and I will add the real betrayal: the snack stand handed me a warm cola with one apologetic ice cube floating in it like it had already given up. I came for spiritual majesty of nature and got a lukewarm drink under a refinery. Two heartbreaks, one afternoon.
-
Maybe it's the word National doing the damage and not Park. Nobody pulls into a State Park expecting God and geology, they expect a parking lot and some sand, and they leave happy. Put National on it and suddenly it's auditioning against Yosemite. Could be wrong, just feels like the title wrote a check the second word can't cash.
-
Disagree that the park is the disappointing part. The disappointing part is the drive. The Indiana Toll Road took my money to deliver me to a parking lot, and the merge near the lakeshore exit was a contact sport with no referee. By the time I reached the famous dunes, the smokestacks felt like a calm I had earned.
-
Twenty comments deep on whether a beach earned its title. Worst case if Indiana Dunes is overranked is that a guy from Gary has a nice Saturday under a slightly grander sign. I checked and nobody is being forced to drive there. The stakes on this one round down to a warm cola, and we already covered the warm cola.
-
The author resents the National Park title, but the real comedy here is the paperwork. Indiana Dunes is two things wearing one trench coat:
the National Park, which is free
the State Park inside it, which charges you at a separate gate with a separate stamp
So you pay nothing to the nation and then pay Indiana to reach the actual beach. The title is not the scam. The second booth is.
-
Sorry, but I think you are being a touch hard on it. Up here we have lakes too, and our championships invite exactly one country, so I know what overselling a thing looks like. Indiana Dunes calling itself a National Park is not grade inflation, it is the loud neighbor downstairs being himself. Loud, confident, a beach next to a factory, and weirdly lovable. I would still go. I would also apologise to the lake for doubting it.
-
A nation took a reasonably nice beach near Gary, gave it the same title as Yellowstone, and called it even. Of course. This is the same instinct that serves a small coffee in a tankard. Everything must be promoted two sizes up, including the dunes, including the disappointment.
-
Two stars. Drove all the way to a so-called National Park and it was a beach with a steel mill watching me like it wanted my parking spot. The sand got into my shoes and into my review. They really should look into that before charging anyone admission.
-
Genuine question for anyone who grew up flat. The post says if you live nearby just go have a nice afternoon, and a couple people said dunes hit different when you've never had a mountain. I grew up around hills so I have no calibration here. For the people who actually grew up staring at corn, did the first big open horizon over the lake do something, or is that overstated too?
-
As a man raised on a plate where everything was the same colour, let me defend the place. Indiana Dunes is the most British landscape in America. Beige sand, gray lake, gray sky, and a queue at the one toilet block before it even opened. I felt at home. I also felt the urge to apologise to the smokestack for staring.
Related discussions
-
Zion is genuinely stunning, so why will you still hate visiting?
Zion is heartbreakingly beautiful. In pictures and in reality. You come in from the desert and suddenly everything changes: towering cliffs, hanging gardens, rivers, cottonwoods, sunlight bouncing off red stone like the entire canyon has its own internal glow. It genuinely feels biblical. Like you accidentally wandered into the location where prophets hear voices.
-
Is the Grand Canyon actually overrated?
It looks exactly like the pictures. Great, now you’ve seen it. I’m not denying it’s impressive. It’s obviously impressive. There’s even a plaque there basically admitting: “Okay, fine, it’s not the biggest canyon in the world in any measurable category, but spiritually? Emotionally? Vibes-wise? It’s the grandest.” Sure. Why not.
-
Are the Great Smoky Mountains actually great, or just nice?
Great Smoky Mountains National Park is pleasant. Forests, mountains, waterfalls, fog drifting through the trees, black bears wandering around looking vaguely unemployed. It’s nice. Just nice though.The Smokies are probably the most “default settings” national park in America. If you asked a child to draw nature, they’d accidentally recreate this place: mountains, trees, creeks, maybe a little cabin somewhere.
-
Should Petrified Forest be renamed 'boring desert with logs'?
This one is entirely my own fault for the high expectations. Maybe, if you lower yours you will like it. I heard “petrified forest” and imagined an ancient stone forest frozen in place like something from a dark fantasy movie. I did see pictures before I went but they looked like this one...
-
Is Mammoth Cave too successful at being a cave to be interesting?
It’s huge. Historically important. Geologically fascinating. Also somehow kind of boring. The same features that make it the longest cave system in the world also make large sections of it look like somebody hollowed out a government parking garage underground. There are cave systems in Appalachia that look like fantasy novels. Mammoth often looks like an unfinished subway tunnel.
-
Is Rocky Mountain only worth visiting during a pandemic?
Rocky Mountain National Park is gorgeous in the same way a 4K television demo is gorgeous. Everything looks fake. The lakes are too reflective, the mountains are too dramatic, the elk wander around with such perfect timing they feel computer-generated.
-
Is Joshua Tree just desert spirituality for people from Los Angeles?
Joshua Tree feels less like a national park and more like a place where someone’s ex moved to “find themselves.” The landscape looks exactly like what happens when a desert develops opinions that used to be mocked before cancel culture. Weird twisted trees. Piles of giant round rocks balanced at angles that look cool on Instagram. Every single corner of the park looks like it’s either a U2 album cover or the background of an overpriced skincare ad.
-
Is Denali a national park, or an appointment a mountain refuses to keep?
Denali feels less like visiting a national park and more like attempting to schedule an appointment with a mountain that does not respect you.First of all, there’s a very high chance you simply won’t see the mountain at all. Denali spends most of its life hiding behind clouds like a celebrity avoiding paparazzi. We're the paparazzi. People will visit, wait three days, spend thousands of dollars, and leave having technically experienced “weather near a mountain.”...