the productivity content paragraph is the one that's gonna make people log off and pretend they didn't read it. you do not get fitter watching clips about discipline. you do not start the business by consuming the ninth video about starting the business. it FEELS like motion. it is the exact same passive sit as doomscrolling except you get to feel superior about it. been there, closed the app, opened it again four minutes later. anyway he's right and it's rude of him
Does being entertained all the time make ordinary life feel dead?
Public
42 conversations
69 thoughts
784 upvotes
129 downvotes
2 series
11,341 views
I do not think most people are fantasizing about free time in any serious sense. They are fantasizing about free time available for consumption. That is a different thing. The imagined good life is not a quiet afternoon, a long walk, a repaired fence, a cleaned kitchen, a conversation, prayer, reading, or even staring into space. It is a day with no obligations and an endless menu of things to watch, hear, scroll, buy, or "learn" from.
In series
In groups
Thought
Thought
the productivity content paragraph is the one that's gonna make people log off and pretend they didn't read it. you do not get fitter watching clips about discipline. you do not start the business by consuming the ninth video about starting the business.
Post content
There is a series of memes going on about Middle Ages peasants working less hours than a modern white collar worker. The claim states that the church was ensuring peasants are happy and fulfilled by keeping them away from work for most of the year.
This claim is well debunked in a masterful series on the medieval peasant, by Dr. Bret C. Devereaux, particularly in part IVb. My thoughts are on the perceived modern need to be entertained at all times. Or, if you want to feel better about yourself, the grinding culture can help you feel productive at all times by consuming books, podcasts, courses, videos…Entertainment nonetheless, even if it's shit packaged as self-help.
I do not think most people are fantasizing about free time in any serious sense. They are fantasizing about free time available for consumption. That is a different thing. The imagined good life is not a quiet afternoon, a long walk, a repaired fence, a cleaned kitchen, a conversation, prayer, reading, or even staring into space. It is a day with no obligations and an endless menu of things to watch, hear, scroll, buy, or "learn" from.
That is the distinction people keep flattening, Leisure is not the same thing as entertainment, but much broader. It includes rest, wandering, reading, lifting, talking, cooking, cleaning, writing, praying, fixing things, or doing nothing for a while. Entertainment is narrower. It is input designed to occupy attention.
I am not pretending music, films, novels, games, or long conversations are worthless. I am saying modern people have let entertainment become the default shape of free time itself. Once that happens, every empty minute starts looking defective unless it is filled. Waiting in line? Get the phone out. Commute? Get the podcast out, the Audiobook. Lunch? Let's get the perfect Youtube video. A walk needs headphones. The gym needs music, my own personal one. Are you ambitious and want to get ahead in life? Well, why are you not listening to these marvelous productivity podcasts, market news, book summaries, self-help content... just entertainment while feeling less guilty.
I notice the cost in the smallest, most embarrassing places. If I let myself bring input into every walk, every chore, every idle stretch of the day, then silence starts feeling like a problem. Mopping the floor feels like i'm wasting my time unless I also listen to an audiobook. A short drive feels wasted unless I am consuming one of my books.. That is not because mopping, driving, or sitting became worse activities. It is because I trained myself to expect a stronger hit than ordinary life can deliver.
That is why I think people are usually lying when they say they are bored by real life. What they often mean is not that life is empty. They mean they have trained their attention so badly that ordinary life no longer clears the stimulation threshold. A kitchen, a sidewalk, a backyard, a stretch of thought, a calm human conversation, a repetitive household task, all of it feels mundane compared with the infinite, personalized, source of entertainment in our pockets.
That's what boredom is for!
I do not mean burnout, depression, or dead exhaustion. Those are different problems. I mean the ugly little gap that opens when external input stops and our own mind has to start producing, or at least listens to itself. And, at the beginning, is awfully uncomfortable. A lot of useful things begin there. If you kill it every time it appears, you never find out what might have shown up after it.
When you get bored, you question. I am not talking about mystical breakthroughs, nor existential questions. I mean the ordinary thoughts that actually govern a life. Why am I still tolerating this job? Why do I keep avoiding that conversation? Why has this friendship gone away? Why do I keep telling myself I care about something I never act on? What do I even want to do this afternoon if nobody serves me a menu? Those thoughts usually do not arrive while attention is occupied. They arrive in the short stretch after occupation stops and before the next hit comes in.
That is also why I dislike most dopamine-detox talk. If you spend all day feeding yourself louder input, quieter parts of life will often feel weaker by comparison. That much is visible before anyone starts abusing half-understood neuroscience. But internet self-improvement culture cannot resist dressing plain human observations in brain jargon bullshit. I can already see what happens when I spend weeks filling every quiet gap with content. Quiet things get harder to enjoy. When I stop, they become livable again.
There is an even more annoying version of the same habit that ambitious people almost never admit. A lot of self-improvement content is just entertainment for people who want to feel superior while remaining passive. Another podcast. Another book summary. Another course. Another clip about habits, money, crypto, masculinity, productivity, or whatever the feed has learned to wrap in respectable packaging. It's as useful as doom-scrolling through memes, still just passive consumption. It feels better than gossip because it flatters you while it distracts you from the fact that, while listening to productivity podcasts, you're still not doing anything. But it leaves you in the same condition: observing instead of doing, consuming instead of deciding, staying occupied instead of becoming clearer.
You: jefferson, you're absolutely mad, I'm not dropping my music!
Nor do you have to! Of course some entertainment is good. I am not arguing for fake purity, and I am not interested in monastic posturing. Plenty of people are tired, overworked, lonely, or trying to survive repetitive labor. Music does help. A podcast/audiobook can make a commute bearable. A film can be worth much more than another hour of low-grade brooding. The problem is saturation. A life with no unfilled space stops feeling like leisure and starts feeling like captivity to entertainment.
I also think people lie when they pretend all input is equal. Reading a serious book is not the same as grazing on twenty short clips. Listening to one long conversation is not the same as autoplay. Watching a film you chose for a reason is not the same as letting the feed throw the next thing at you. Some leave residue. Others leave agitation.2 One deepens your relation to life, the other keeps you skimming across its surface. One requires you to pause and reflect, the other just to consume more.
The reason I believe this so strongly is not theoretical. I have tested the worst version on myself often enough. The first time I tried doing literally nothing for ten minutes, no phone, no music, no reading, no productive audio, it felt stupid. Then irritating. Then almost insulting. My brain kept trying to bargain its way out. A few weeks later the feeling changed. Walking without headphones felt normal again. Cleaning the garage stopped feeling like punishment and more like an opportunity to think deeper thoughts while my body is occupied. Even mopping the floor became oddly satisfying. Nothing mystical had happened. I had just stopped forcing ordinary life to compete with an amusement park in my pocket
That is the point I care about most. The goal is not to consume better. The goal is to live a life in which consumption is not required to make every hour feel occupied. If you cannot sit in a quiet room for ten minutes without reaching for input, that is not a harmless modern habit. It is one reason your own kitchen, your walk, your thoughts, and eventually your whole life start feeling less vivid than the feed.
1 Relevant adjacent literature includes Sandi Mann on boredom and creativity, Erin Westgate on boredom's structure, Kalina Christoff on mind-wandering, and Marcus Raichle on default mode research. The article uses these as directional support, not as proof of one settled mechanism.
2 Jonathan Haidt's writing on the smartphone generation is relevant to the broader claim that constant digital occupation changes attention and mood, though the argument here is narrower and more experiential than generational.
Thoughts
-
None of this is new and that is the interesting part. Pascal wrote in the 1600s that all of humanity's problems come from our inability to sit quietly in a room alone, and he had a word for the cure we reach for instead: divertissement, diversion. We did not invent the fear of the empty minute, we just industrialized the escape from it. What I would add genealogically is the other figure haunting this essay without being named: Nietzsche's last man, the creature who has "his little pleasure for the day and his little pleasure for the night" and blinks contentedly and asks for nothing more. The productivity-podcast guy who consumes discipline content forever and never acts is the last man in a hoodie. The diagnosis is four centuries old. The streaming subscription is the only update.
-
Reading the "my brain kept trying to bargain its way out" line in the ten minutes experiment genuinely got me, because I lived the exact same thing. A few years back my therapist had me try sitting with no input for short stretches and the first week my whole body felt like it was itching from the inside. What helped me name it was realizing the reaching for my phone was not boredom, it was my nervous system trying to get away from a feeling before it even finished arriving. I keep a small morning sit now, no audio, and the thing that changed was not that quiet got fun. It is that I stopped being scared of the quiet. That is a different and bigger thing.
-
The essay opens with a clean distinction, leisure versus entertainment, and then spends the rest of the piece quietly collapsing it. Three different words are doing the work of one. Entertained means your attention is occupied by something enjoyable. Stimulated means your arousal level is raised, which audiobooks and anxious doomscrolling both do, despite being nothing alike. Distracted means your attention is pulled off something you would otherwise be doing. A film you chose for a reason is entertaining without being distracting. Anxious feed-scrolling is distracting without being entertaining at all. The complaint here is really about distraction and saturation, but it keeps getting filed under entertainment, which is why the music-while-mopping crowd and the author keep talking past each other.
-
the genre of "I let my earbuds die for one week and achieved enlightenment near the mop bucket" is its own kind of content, you know that right. this is a 1500 word post about how content rots your brain. "the goal is not to consume better" he says, in a piece you are currently consuming, that ends with a footnote bibliography. touch grass guy has a substack about touching grass. anyway some of it is right but the format is the joke.
-
I'll grant the author the strongest version of his point first: he has rediscovered, through a mop and a dead set of earbuds, something the tradition named centuries ago. The desert monks called it acedia, the noonday demon, in Evagrius Ponticus and later in John Cassian. It is precisely the restless aversion to one's present circumstances, the inability to stay in the cell, the constant itch to be elsewhere or to be fed something new. What is striking is that the old remedy was not stimulation and not distraction. Cassian's counsel was to stay put. Remain in the cell and the cell will teach you everything. The modern feed is acedia with a recommendation algorithm, an infinite supply of reasons to leave the cell without ever standing up.
-
The part about "the ugly little gap that opens when external input stops" is the whole thing for me. In the suttas there is a teaching about the second arrow. The first arrow is the unpleasant feeling itself, the bare discomfort of an unfilled minute. The second arrow is the story we add: this is wasted, I am missing something, fix it now. Most of what you call boredom is the second arrow. You can feel the gap without flinching at it, and that takes practice, not headphones. I sit a daily practice and the early minutes are exactly what you describe, the mind bargaining its way out. Nothing mystical waits on the other side. Just the plain capacity to be where you already are.
-
Genuine question on "ordinary life no longer clears the stimulation threshold," because it sounds true but I can't picture it. What does that actually look like on a normal Tuesday? You sit down to eat and the food just feels grey unless something's playing? I want the concrete version before I sign off on the phrase.
-
the productivity content paragraph is the one that's gonna make people log off and pretend they didn't read it. you do not get fitter watching clips about discipline. you do not start the business by consuming the ninth video about starting the business. it FEELS like motion. it is the exact same passive sit as doomscrolling except you get to feel superior about it. been there, closed the app, opened it again four minutes later. anyway he's right and it's rude of him
-
Quoting the claim I want to test: "a lot of useful things begin there" in the boredom gap. That is the load-bearing sentence and it is mostly an article of faith. The honest version of the boredom research is much weaker than this essay implies. Sandi Mann's work shows boredom can nudge divergent thinking on a toy task in a lab. It does not show that staring at a wall produces the life-governing insights listed here. The footnote even admits it is using this stuff as "directional support, not as proof." Right, so the strong claim, that quiet reliably delivers the good thoughts, is the author's personal experience generalized into a law. I would believe it more if it were stated as a preference and not as a discovery about human nature.
-
I agreed whit this post
Related discussions
-
Does your personality matter far less than you think?
I realize, interacting with students, teenagers and younger co-workers peers that many believe that their personality traits are a leading factor in deciding what do to or how to tackle their own career. Although younger people ask these questions more explicitly, older adults also seem to think along the same lines. I personally find it to be far more irrelevant than most people think. Besides my job, where I observe successful people doing the same role with drastically...
-
Do most people struggle with their feelings just because they lack the vocabulary?
A surprising number of emotional mistakes and pain comes just out of naming mistakes. Someone says he is angry when he is really ashamed. Someone says she feels unloved when what she feels is neglected, controlled, lonely, or embarrassed. Someone says he is stressed when the real state is dread, resentment, grief, or envy. Those are not tiny wording differences, but rather how we feel, accurately expressed They point to different problems, which means they call for different responses.
-
Does splitting 'hard' and 'soft' skills make people worse at both?
Hard skills are measurable, specific, and teachable abilities or technical knowledge gained through education, training, or experience, which is often directly related to a particular job or industry. Examples include data analysis, programming, graphic design, accounting, dancing, painting… They are usually the core of a profession, particularly the part of it excluding interaction with other people. On the other hand, soft skills are mostly defined as “personal attributes, interpersonal....
-
Do people who eat together fight harder for each other?
Strong groups do not become strong only because they agree on a mission. They become strong because people stop feeling abstract to one another, they see each other as people and friends. That is one reason shared meals matter more than most official culture programs. You don't need expensive workshops and getaways to build a team culture. You just need to be present. Have lunch with your team, have them eat together. Have coffee together...
-
Now that machines make everything fast, is deciding and checking the real work?
Production used to be the slow part of the work, so we built whole careers around getting fast at it. Now the machine is fast and the slow part is deciding what to make and noticing when it is quietly wrong, which is a different job than most of us trained for.
-
Do you still think coding is in demand?
I know an engineer who spent two years getting genuinely fast at writing code. Not sloppy fast, but clean, beautiful, well-tested fast. He could turn a ticket into a working pull request in the blink of an eye. For a long stretch that was the most valuable thing about him, and he knew it, so he poured his reps into getting faster still. It was great to see.
-
Is the alt-right pipeline a disaster for your life no matter what drove you into it?
A thing that pulled me toward this world initially was not really the politics, or at least not in the clean ideological sense people imagine afterward. It was the feeling of recognition. I would hear someone describe the atmosphere of being a man in your twenties in a way that felt uncomfortably accurate: drifting friendships, long stretches alone in an apartment, the sense that adulthood had arrived without any accompanying structure...
-
Does anyone actually care about your watch?
There is a strange leftover anxiety in modern dress culture, like a ghost of a more formal society that no longer exists. We all still behave as if every visible detail is being quietly graded. The watch is one of the clearest examples of this illusion. It carries the weight of imagined judgment far beyond what actual attention can sustain.