ok genuine q: "particle time thickness" in normal words? like thick in what, and what's one thing i'd see if a particle had more of it
The Universe is a Unified Object
Thought
ok genuine q: "particle time thickness" in normal words? like thick in what, and what's one thing i'd see if a particle had more of it
Post content
A physics book: "The Universe is a Unified Object"
Author: Ngo Quang Ha
Book Cover Image:
The content of Volume 1 of this book presents the scientific discoveries of the author Ngo Quang Ha in the field of theoretical physics. It includes:
-
Discovering errors in the construction of the Lorentz transformation regarding the coefficient k (the value k=γ is incorrect, the correct value is k=1), reconstructing the Lorentz transformations, thereby resolving the paradoxes of time dilation and length dilation in special relativity, such as the twin paradox, the ladder length paradox, and the grandfather paradox. Simultaneously refuting the multiverse theory.
-
Proving that Hawking radiation does not exist (Hawking radiation contradicts the very theoretical foundations of general relativity and quantum mechanics) thus resolves the black hole information paradox.
-
Developing a new definition of time: time consists of two components: global time and particular time. Explain why global time has only one dimension.
-
Developing a theory of particle time thickness and explain quantum entanglement and time-slit phenomena.
-
A visual explanation of quantum superposition and crystal-time phenomena based on the spacetime structure of microscopic particles.
-
Explain the underlying causes of the uncertainty principle and quantum tunneling. Differentiate between the intrinsic vibrations of particles and vacuum energy.
-
Constructing a geometric description of momentum. Explain why a particle with mass cannot have a velocity equal to the speed of light.
-
A new definition of energy: All forms of energy are quantities that characterize motion. Energy is not a scalar quantity; it has a direction, leading to the existence of positive energy, negative energy, and neutral energy.
-
Introducing a new understanding of potential energy: potential energy is fundamentally an unreal quantity; the transformation from potential energy to kinetic energy is essentially a transformation from rest energy to kinetic energy. In static fields, such as the gravitational field around a heavy object, the field contains no energy and does not change the total energy of an object moving freely within it.
-
Constructing the geometric structure of the universe includes dimensions of time, space, weak force dimensions, electromagnetic force, and strong force dimensions. Some spatial dimensions are not perpendicular to each other. The distinct geometric characteristics of these extra dimensions give rise to the characteristic properties of each force field.
-
Developing a new quantum theory: force fields are continuous spaces (similar to classical fields), and particle generation is a quantum process. This new field theory is called a spatial field theory.
-
From the geometric structure of space, constructing geometric descriptions of fermion and boson particles. Basically, fermion particles have a vortex shape, while boson particles have a wave shape.
-
Describing the geometry and explain the mechanism of spin 1/2 of fermion particles. Explaining why color confinement and spin 1/2 of nucleon particles occur. Providing a clear explanation of the chiral nature of particles.
-
Offering a new explanation of quantum causes in the microscopic world, replacing quantum field theory. Explains why the quantum gravitational particle graviton does not exist and resolves the vacuum energy density crisis of quantum field theory.
-
Constructing structural models of fundamental particles: quarks, electrons, neutrinos. A fermion not only contains positive energy but also neutral energy (similar to a boson), explaining the differences between the three generations of particles.
-
Introducing a new perspective on mass: if a field oscillation (particle) is localized, it will have inertial mass (this view contradicts the old view that particles with mass are localized). From this, a formula for calculating the mass of fundamental particles is developed.
-
A new explanation for the cause of mass in the weak W and Z bosons.
-
Explaining the cause of neutrino mass and the phenomenon of neutrino oscillation.
-
Solving the Yang-Mills field problem: gluons have mass and construct a formula for the mass of a gluon, ensuring that the gauge symmetry is not broken.
-
Constructing a principle and formula of particle decay. Explaining why protons are very stable.
-
Developing a new theory about the origin of the universe, the Big Crash, to replace the Big Bang theory, addressing the limitations of the Big Bang theory, combining it with the geometric structure of the universe to explain why there are no magnetic monopoles, the imbalance between matter and antimatter, dark energy, dark matter, explaining the symmetry-breaking CP of the weak force and why the strong force breaks CP symmetry very little, almost zero.
-
Developing a new geometric model for general relativity to clearly describe the phenomena occurring inside black holes, eliminating singularities in current mathematical models of black holes.
-
Developing a unified theory of the four fundamental forces of nature based on a 10-dimensional spatial structure.
-
Developing a theory of ordered chaotic systems (internal chaos) and classify chaotic systems according to their intrinsic characteristics.
-
Demonstrating that a fluid is not an inherently chaotic system. The turbulence in a fluid is caused by external factors.
-
Solving the problem of smooth solutions to the Naiver-Stoke equation based on two assumptions for constructing the equation: the fluid is incompressible and continuous
Thoughts
-
PermalinkThe ebook is now free on Amazon
https://www.amazon.com/UNIVERSE-UNIFIED-OBJECT-Building-ballpoint-ebook/dp/B0HCGYPFK1/ref=tmm_kin_swatch_0 -
Permalinkof the 26, which one came to you first? i'd guess the Lorentz k business, since the rest seems to hang off it
-
Permalinkdumb question but is any of this on arxiv or in a journal anywhere, or is the book the only place it lives so far? 🙂
-
Permalinkitem 9 is the one i keep snagging on. a static gravitational field holding no energy is a lot of weight for one sentence to carry. maybe i'm reading it more literally than it was meant, not sure
-
Permalinknavier stokes shows up at item 26, below the gluon mass formula. the pacing on this list is something else
-
Permalinkok genuine q: "particle time thickness" in normal words? like thick in what, and what's one thing i'd see if a particle had more of it
-
Permalinkwait, point 3, global time vs particular time. what would the particular time of a rock be? that's the exact spot where i lost it
-
PermalinkPoint 9 calls potential energy "fundamentally an unreal quantity". Unreal how: false, or a bookkeeping term with no referent? Those two need completely different arguments.
-
PermalinkItem 1 is the load bearing one, so everything else waits on it. If k=1 the transformation collapses back to Galilean at high v, and then you owe an account of muon lifetimes at accelerators, the Hafele Keating clocks, and the correction GPS satellites need to stay accurate. Those are not interpretations, they are numbers that come out wrong without gamma. What does your version predict for the muon flux at sea level? Put a number on it and it becomes testable.
-
PermalinkRelated websites:
The Universe is a unified Object (https://the-universe-is-a-unified-object.amed.vn)
The Universe is a unified Object (https://the-universe-is-a-unified-object.afreeday.com)
The Universe is a unified Object (https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61591400279715&rdid=89IvdRVyg7cjzw6Z)
The Universe is a unified Object (https://www.instagram.com/p/DaAeAGhT2Iu/)
Related posts
-
Does being entertained all the time make ordinary life feel dead?
I do not think most people are fantasizing about free time in any serious sense. They are fantasizing about free time available for consumption. That is a different thing. The imagined good life is not a quiet afternoon, a long walk, a repaired fence, a cleaned kitchen, a conversation, prayer, reading, or even staring into space. It is a day with no obligations and an endless menu of things to watch, hear, scroll, buy, or "learn" from.
-
Does wearing a Patek Philippe make you a protagonist, or just its caretaker?
Patek Philippe is what happens when a watch brand decides time itself is a family heirloom. Most watch companies sell you a product. Patek sells you the idea that you are temporarily entrusted with a moral artifact that will outlive your personality, your opinions, and possibly your entire bloodline’s ability to dress correctly. The famous slogan—“You never actually own a Patek Philippe, you merely look after it for the next generation”—is doing an absurd amount of psychological heavy lifting.…
-
Does anyone actually care about your watch?
There is a strange leftover anxiety in modern dress culture, like a ghost of a more formal society that no longer exists. We all still behave as if every visible detail is being quietly graded. The watch is one of the clearest examples of this illusion. It carries the weight of imagined judgment far beyond what actual attention can sustain.
-
Do you really need to have an opinion on everything?
There is a difference between an opinion and a judgment, and almost everything in the way we live now is built to make you forget it. An opinion is what you can produce in four seconds when someone asks. A judgment is what you have after you have spent real time with a thing, watched it behave under pressure, been wrong about it once or twice, and corrected. The first is nearly free. The second costs attention you cannot get back, and you can only afford it for a handful of subjects in a life.…
-
Should politicians actually get paid more?
People like the idea of cheap politics because it feels morally clean. If politicians are underpaid, the thinking goes, they must be serving for noble reasons. If the salary is modest, corruption must have less room to grow. It is an attractive fantasy and a bad way to design a state. In fact, is an elitist way and it leads to government by the rich, who can afford it.
-
Are airlines betting you'll never redeem that travel credit?
When an airline hands you a travel credit instead of your money back, it has not done you a favor. It has converted a refund it owed in cash into a coupon it controls. The money stays on the airline's balance sheet. You carry the risk that you never get it back, be it because it expires, because you lose it, because it's difficult to redeem and you give up... Both of those facts are deliberate, and the language wrapped around them, "flexibility," "credit toward future travel," exists to keep…
-
Are Bulgarian split squats far superior to back squats?
If you are not a powerlifter, stop training legs like one. Actually, stop training everything like one. That is the argument. It took me years to realize that I didn't need to keep on lifting more and more on squats, since my legs didn't change after anyway. lbs would go up, muscles would stay pretty much the same. And the rest of my body paid the bill, less volume on arms, core, chest... Due to the focus on maintaining strong squat numbers. The problem is that seriousness, exhaustion, and...
-
Do larger budgets destroy TV shows rather than improve them?
Some of the most expensive fantasy ever put on screen felt emptier than the more limited work that came before it. That is not because viewers secretly prefer cheapness. It is because abundance is a terrible substitute for judgment and good storytelling.