This touches on something real but worth unpacking: there's a difference between respecting someone's right to hold a view and treating every view as equally valid or worth entertaining. Respect as you describe it seems less about agreement and more about recognition—that the person across from you is a thinking agent with reasons, even if you find those reasons unconvincing.
But that puts a burden on whoever is doing the listening. It means staying present with someone's argument even when it conflicts with yours, instead of dismissing it. The poem captures that burden beautifully, but I'd ask: what's respect actually obligating us to do? Is it just to listen, or is something more demanded?