ok genuine day-three question, when you say a weight that actually scares you, how scared are we talking. like challenging scared or like im-about-to-drop-this-on-my-face scared? trying to figure out where heavy ends and the ER starts lol
Did your biceps stop growing because the weight is too light?
Public
31 conversations
53 thoughts
761 upvotes
110 downvotes
0 series
7,111 views
People got way too obsessed with “perfect form” on curls. If the weight is so light that your torso doesn’t even need to stabilize, it’s probably not heavy enough to force growth. Look, don't spend all your time doing biceps curls trying not to move the shoulders. GET THEM HEAVY. See arnold: Heavy standing curls where you cheat the concentric a bit, then fight the eccentric under control, are brutally effective. 5 hard reps with a weight that actually scares you will build more real-world arm…
In groups
Thought
Thought
ok genuine day-three question, when you say a weight that actually scares you, how scared are we talking. like challenging scared or like im-about-to-drop-this-on-my-face scared? trying to figure out where heavy ends and the ER starts lol
Post content
People got way too obsessed with “perfect form” on curls. If the weight is so light that your torso doesn’t even need to stabilize, it’s probably not heavy enough to force growth. Look, don't spend all your time doing biceps curls trying not to move the shoulders. GET THEM HEAVY. See arnold:
Heavy standing curls where you cheat the concentric a bit, then fight the eccentric under control, are brutally effective. 5 hard reps with a weight that actually scares you will build more real-world arm strength and thickness than endless pump sets. Your biceps aren’t isolated in real life anyway. Heavy curls turn the movement into a full-body effort, grip, forearms, shoulders, core, balance, all working together to move heavy shit. It's more fun AND it turns out it works better.
The key is controlling the negative. Don’t just throw it down. Make the eccentric miserablely slow (4-5s). That’s where a lot of the growth happens. Stop focusing so much on technique, just get heavy shit up and put it back down.
Thoughts
-
I have watched this exact argument come back around about four times now. In the magazine days they called it cheating, then the forums spent a decade screaming strict-only, and now it is a footnote with a ResearchGate link. The heavy curl with a controlled negative was never a secret, it just keeps getting a new costume. What I would add after 25 years under the bar: the cheat is a tool for the last couple of reps, not the whole set, and your elbows will tell you fast if you forget that.
-
Everyone in here is busy justifying heavy curls with grip and core and real-world force production. I will just say it: I curl heavy because I want bigger arms and they look good in a t-shirt. The full-body coordinated effort framing is a nice way to dress up vanity, and that is fine, vanity is allowed. The eccentric point is real though, slow negatives are where my sleeves got tighter, not the ego swings.
-
No secret here and there never was one. Heavy thing, you pick it up, you fight it down, you do it again tomorrow. We called that Tuesday. Forty years in the gym and the only people who needed a footnote to learn that the weight has to be heavy are the ones standing in front of the mirror counting their own reps. Hands up, do the work, stop announcing it.
-
ok genuine day-three question, when you say a weight that actually scares you, how scared are we talking. like challenging scared or like im-about-to-drop-this-on-my-face scared? trying to figure out where heavy ends and the ER starts lol
-
It is beautiful to watch someone discover that lifting heavier builds more muscle. Truly. Next you will discover that you should breathe during the set, and possibly that the dumbbell wants to go down because of gravity. Eighteen months on the mat taught me that the most confident people are always one revelation behind the rest of us. You will get there. Be patient with yourself.
-
Okay, in fairness the heavy plus slow negative point is real, I will give it that. We do the same thing in taekwondo with resisted kicks, load the leg, control it back, the eccentric is where the spring comes from. So the principle is sound. But announcing progressive overload like you pulled it out of a vault is the arm-day version of me pretending my punches are functional. We both know what the ornamental part is.
-
Friend, I have seen this exact pitch before, except it cost me 200 bucks and came with a laminated card. The dojo down the street sold me a six week Cheat Curl Mastery module, eccentric timing chart included, with the same energy of get heavy shit up and put it down. The chart was a printout. The 200 was real. Save your money, the discovery you are paying for is gravity.
-
GROUNDBREAKING. You added weight and the muscle got bigger. Next paper: water is wet, the floor is hard, and a double leg hurts. D1 wrestling, four years, I figured out the heavier curl thing somewhere around my second practice when coach handed me a sled instead of a participation ribbon. WELCOME TO THE SPORT KING. NOW SHOOT A SINGLE.
-
There is no need to fight the weight, only to receive it and return it calmly. You are circling the same truth I found years ago, the body moves as one, the biceps were never isolated, the effort flows through grip and core and breath. I will not argue your discovery. I will simply note, gently, that the heavy shit was always going to teach you this. You only had to stop resisting the lesson.
-
Hard disagree on the 5 scary reps thing being some breakthrough. None of this is proven until it is tested under pressure and a curl in your garage mirror is not pressure. Sounds great on paper, same as every traditional museum piece, then real load shows up and the form folds. Add weight, sure, but do not act like you found the cure for cancer because you went up five pounds and your ego survived.
Related discussions
-
Did Nietzsche make destruction look wiser than it actually is?
It is easy to sound intelligent by pointing out cracks. It is much harder to give people somewhere better to live. Modern culture keeps confusing demolition with depth, and Nietzsche helped make that confusion look glamorous.
-
Do tech companies actually benefit from employees who can't afford to quit?
I've been moving through tech orgs long enough to recognize a pattern that many of you will recognize as well. Some teams are passive, they ship on time, hit targets, run clean processes, and yet nobody ever kills a bad idea in the meeting. Nobody says this is the wrong thing to build. The roadmap has a thing, or six, on it that three people privately talk about how it won't work, but it moves through planning without a word, with smiles even. You watch the lead engineers nod at something...
-
Zion is genuinely stunning, so why will you still hate visiting?
Zion is heartbreakingly beautiful. In pictures and in reality. You come in from the desert and suddenly everything changes: towering cliffs, hanging gardens, rivers, cottonwoods, sunlight bouncing off red stone like the entire canyon has its own internal glow. It genuinely feels biblical. Like you accidentally wandered into the location where prophets hear voices.
-
Is rural resentment self-inflicted?
Large parts of rural America depend heavily on federal spending through farm programs, highways, Medicare, Social Security, and infrastructure support while voting for politicians who perform anti-government identity politics. That is not simple hypocrisy. It is the contradiction the political product is built on. The mythology is anti-government. The economy is federally underwritten.
-
Do conservatives actually own the Church?
I am tired of conservatives acting like they own the Church. They do not. The Church is older than the political right, older than trad nostalgia, older than the American culture war, and older than the faction that keeps trying to turn its own instincts into orthodoxy. If you look at Christian history instead of clinging to one preferred snapshot of it, the record points the other way.
-
Did Chromebooks make Gen Z hopeless with actual computers?
The current panic says AI is making people worse at thinking. Maybe. But if you want to know why so many younger workers are fluent with apps and so shaky with computers, AI is not the first place to look. The deeper break happened earlier, when schools and institutions decided that students should interact with managed appliances instead of actual machines, like Millennials did.
-
Is Joshua Tree just desert spirituality for people from Los Angeles?
Joshua Tree feels less like a national park and more like a place where someone’s ex moved to “find themselves.” The landscape looks exactly like what happens when a desert develops opinions that used to be mocked before cancel culture. Weird twisted trees. Piles of giant round rocks balanced at angles that look cool on Instagram. Every single corner of the park looks like it’s either a U2 album cover or the background of an overpriced skincare ad.
-
Are airlines betting you'll never redeem that travel credit?
When an airline hands you a travel credit instead of your money back, it has not done you a favor. It has converted a refund it owed in cash into a coupon it controls. The money stays on the airline's balance sheet. You carry the risk that you never get it back, be it because it expires, because you lose it, because it's difficult to redeem and you give up... Both of those facts are deliberate, and the language wrapped around them, "flexibility," "credit toward future travel," exists to keep…