Skip to content
Loading…

How to live life with oneness.... A.k.a. smadhi

UnknownMind
Thought

Thought

nodding_along

The male/female comparison is the one I keep turning over. Nobody hunts for proof that they have a body, so hunting for presence is the same mix up. Fair point.

The male/female comparison is the one I keep turning over. Nobody hunts for proof that they have a body, so hunting for presence is the same mix up. Fair point.

Post content

To remove this thought of that you are not in smadhi. This is the biggest ignorance you have and onces you remove it. Well congratulations you are in oneness now.

Removing this ignorance is the toughest part to live with oneness.

As I said already you are oneness that's it. Check it out only one time that you are presence simple. After that everything depends upon your ignorance. Ignorance is nothing but thinking that you are not presence or simply still trying to find out presence somewhere. It's like a male trying to find itself as male..... You don't have ignorance in case of male or female body. Then why you have ignorance of presence?

Leave your ignorance that you are not presence simple. Samadhi means you are presence now don't overthink it.

Thoughts

  • clown_to_clown

    Being handed enlightenment with a casual congrats is the best customer service I've had all year 😄

    Permalink
  • commuterstudent

    Me reading this while overthinking whether I'm overthinking it. The don't overthink it part at the end was aimed straight at me lol

    Permalink
  • nodding_along

    The male/female comparison is the one I keep turning over. Nobody hunts for proof that they have a body, so hunting for presence is the same mix up. Fair point.

    Permalink

Related posts

  • Is therapy just confession with the theology stripped out?

    One of the funniest things about secular modern culture is watching people reinvent Christianity piece by piece while acting intellectually superior the entire time. People abandoned confession and now pay someone $240 plus taxes an hour to listen to them describe their guilt in a softly lit room. They abandoned sin and replaced it with "unprocessed trauma." They abandoned repentance and replaced it with "doing the work." They abandoned examination of conscience and replaced it with journaling…

  • Does atheism make you more rational, or just leave a void you fill badly?

    One of the common atheist temptations is to confuse unbelief with clarity, to assume that religion is the irrational part, so removing religion must leave behind a cleaner and more rational human being. But human beings do not work that way, human beings operate through beliefs, emotions... We do not stop wanting ritual, purity, moral tribe, sense of sacredness or transcendent meaning just because we stop using religious language for those desires.

  • Were the Romans far more progressive than we give them credit for?

    There is a common trend of young men being interested in the Roman empire out of movies and populat history, and imagining it as a militaristic, right wing hyper-masculine empire that was great for men. Spartacus, Rome, Gladiator... to different degree all give a perception of Rome being a sort of warrior-culture, sometimes bogged down by decadence. Gladiator II takes this to a ridiculous extreme. For that particular movie, I recommend reading Brett's, from acoup.blog , critique:

  • Did Catholic monotheism make the universe safe to study?

    It is easy to tell the story of science as a clean break from religion. Enlightenment replaces superstition, observation replaces faith, reason replaces authority. It sounds tidy, and it flatters modern assumptions. But it misses something more interesting and, honestly, more uncomfortable for that narrative: the idea that the universe is intelligible in the first place is not self-evident. It is a metaphysical claim. And Catholic monotheism is one of the major historical reasons that claim…

  • Does the state corrupt the Church more than the Church ever corrupts the state?

    Constantine's church became an instrument of imperial politics within a generation. Franco's bishops became collaborators in child theft. Patriarch Kirill blesses wars. The question is not whether you will gain political influence. The question is what will be left of what you started with once the people who wanted the influence are done with it.

  • Dream Catcher

    Have you wondered what if you just get the next thing you desire? Have you thought what would be the consequences of longing for too much?

  • Does secular society still believe in original sin?

    One of the funniest things about modern secular culture is that it absolutely still believes in original sin. It just refuses to call it that because theological language makes educated people uncomfortable. Listen to how modern institutions describe human beings. We are governed by unconscious bias, shaped by childhood conditioning, manipulated by algorithms, trapped in dopamine loops, distorted by social incentives, blinded by ideology, and mostly incapable of seeing our own motivations…

  • Is simulation theory just theism with extra steps?

    One of the funniest intellectual developments of the last decade is watching aggressively secular people reinvent religion using computer terminology and then acting like this makes the idea more rational. Simulation theory is the clearest example. The basic concept is familiar by now, but I'll summarize: our universe might be an artificial simulation created by a vastly more advanced intelligence. Reality is likely programmed. Consciousness could exist inside a designed system. The laws of…

Public 1 conversation 4 thoughts 18 upvotes 0 downvotes 0 series

To remove this thought of that you are not in smadhi. This is the biggest ignorance you have and onces you remove it. Well congratulations you are in oneness now.

In groups