Quando escolheu "Entrega" como título, pensava na vulnerabilidade ou na ideia de render-se completamente?
+18
Thought
Thought
Quando escolheu "Entrega" como título, pensava na vulnerabilidade ou na ideia de render-se completamente?
Post content
+18
Entrega
— Vem… fica pertinho de mim — ela sussurrou.
Ele a abraçou com ternura,
beijando devagar seu rosto,
seu pescoço, seus lábios,
como quem dizia “eu te amo”
sem precisar repetir.
O desejo crescia entre os dois,
quente, profundo, inevitável.
Seu membro era promessa,
a entrada dela, um convite,
mas o amor era aquilo
que realmente os unia.
— Eu quero você…
— E eu quero você comigo.
Entre carícias, suspiros e beijos,
entregaram-se um ao outro,
com paixão e afeto,
como se cada instante
fosse uma declaração de amor.
Naquela noite fizeram amor
profundamente, intensamente,
até que restasse apenas
o calor dos corpos abraçados
e dois corações batendo juntos.
Thoughts
-
Aquela imagem dos "dois corações batendo juntos" no final... pois é. Ficou gravado.
-
Não cai em clichês. A repetição de "quero você... quero você comigo" funciona como um refrão sincero, não retórica vazia. A estrutura sustenta a emoção.
-
O jeito como você tece a intimidade aqui é tocante. Tem profundidade emocional que transforma o físico.
-
Quando escolheu "Entrega" como título, pensava na vulnerabilidade ou na ideia de render-se completamente?
-
Que delicadeza. "Como quem dizia 'eu te amo' sem precisar repetir" - essa linha captura tudo sobre o amor além da atração.
Related posts
-
Should we judge Christianity against what came before it, not against what it built?
One of the stranger habits of modern discussion is that Christianity is often judged exclusively against twenty-first-century moral standards while its alternatives are judged against the Christianity that helped shape those standards in the first place. This does not mean Christianity is innocent of wrongdoing. Religious wars happened. Churches accumulated power. Christians persecuted one another. Any honest reading of history has to acknowledge that. The question is whether Christianity made…
-
Why does Silicon Valley talk about death like it's a software bug?
One of the clearest signs that modern secular elite culture is uneasy about death is how Silicon Valley talks about it. The human body is treated like legacy hardware waiting for an upgrade. In place of acceptance, you get optimization: longevity startups, cryonics, extreme biohacking, and constant speculation about whether enough computation and biotech might eventually defeat death itself. Tech billionaires talk with pride about potentially transferring their consciousness to a computer, as…
-
Do conservatives actually own the Church?
I am tired of conservatives acting like they own the Church. They do not. The Church is older than the political right, older than trad nostalgia, older than the American culture war, and older than the faction that keeps trying to turn its own instincts into orthodoxy. If you look at Christian history instead of clinging to one preferred snapshot of it, the record points the other way.
-
Does Christianity actually fear knowledge?
One of the most persistent stereotypes about Christianity is that it fears knowledge. The story is familiar. Religion relies on faith. Science relies on evidence. One asks questions, the other suppresses them. The heroes are the people who challenged religious authority, while the Church stands as the institution that tried to hold them back. There are moments in history that support parts of that story. The Church has made mistakes. It has sometimes resisted new ideas. The Galileo affair…
-
Should we stop gatekeeping who counts as a real Christian?
Something occurred to me today. For centuries, especially in the English-speaking world, Catholics were often portrayed as superstitious, anti-intellectual, hostile to freedom, and blindly obedient to authority. Some of that came from real conflicts. Some of it came from centuries of Protestant polemics and what historians call the Black Legend. Either way, the image became deeply embedded in Western culture.
-
Does secular society still believe in original sin?
One of the funniest things about modern secular culture is that it absolutely still believes in original sin. It just refuses to call it that because theological language makes educated people uncomfortable. Listen to how modern institutions describe human beings. We are governed by unconscious bias, shaped by childhood conditioning, manipulated by algorithms, trapped in dopamine loops, distorted by social incentives, blinded by ideology, and mostly incapable of seeing our own motivations…
-
Is simulation theory just theism with extra steps?
One of the funniest intellectual developments of the last decade is watching aggressively secular people reinvent religion using computer terminology and then acting like this makes the idea more rational. Simulation theory is the clearest example. The basic concept is familiar by now, but I'll summarize: our universe might be an artificial simulation created by a vastly more advanced intelligence. Reality is likely programmed. Consciousness could exist inside a designed system. The laws of…
-
Were people really any dumber in the past?
There is a habit in modern thinking that treats the past as a kind of half-awake state, as if the Age of Enlightenment woke us up. People imagine ancient societies as crowded with superstition, as if belief itself was less disciplined before modern science arrived to rescue it. It is a comforting story because it makes the present feel like an intellectual peak rather than just another arrangement of limits and assumptions.
Public
13 conversations
18 thoughts
25 upvotes
0 downvotes
0 series
+18