Skip to content
Loading…

Calculation of your life times left in human world.

UnknownMind

Post content

The calculation of your life times left is based completely on your desires—specifically, your karmic desires.

Karmic desires—to understand human lives—depend solely upon your karmic desires.

Karmic desires are nothing but a collection of desires due to which a being (the being itself is a collection of memories) takes birth in this world. How can one know these desires? Simply put, these are the desires that will not leave you alone no matter what. For example, if you have a desire to build a strong body, this desire will persist with you all the time, even on your deathbed, and we all know that such a desire cannot be fulfilled on a deathbed. We also know that this desire has its timeframe—which is in our younger days when we can achieve such a goal—but if that being is not able to achieve the goal, it will persist with that being even after death. So, there is a high chance for that being to extend the date of its freedom from human life and keep taking birth until this desire is completely fulfilled. You see, finding your karmic desires is actually important because there are desires that are not the karmic desires of the being; they come from society, or a competitive and uneducated society that gives much more importance to competition instead of fulfilling your desires.

This is the reason why a student of spirituality generally stays away from society, because this society itself is wholly based on competition and nothing more. Parents are generally the reason for deciding everything for their children; these types of parents do not know it, but they are destroying the destination of their own children.

How do you know your karmic desires? These desires will persist deep inside your heart, and you probably already know the answer. Because these are your desires, nobody can find them for you. You have to decide on your own. Based on those desires, you can easily guess the number of lives you have left in the human world.

Example: A being has two karmic desires left—one is to become tall and masculine, and the other is to look cute and short. Both of these desires are not possible to cover in one lifetime. Therefore, that being has to take two lifetimes. However, if these desires are something like "I want to become tall and cute," then it is possible in one lifetime, so the chances of that being fulfilling its karmic desires in one lifetime increase greatly. The only thing that can hinder it is probably this society and that being's biological parents. But if your karmic desires have high intensity, then nobody can stop that being. How that being increases the intensity of its karmic desires depends heavily on the environment and good parenting, because if parents understand the desires of the child, it becomes easy.

This is how you can calculate your lifetimes in this human world; it is pretty simple. The best thing is to first know your karmic desires, not the desires that come from the outside world. Becoming rich and showing off is generally the main desire that comes from the outside world or a competitive mindset. According to me, a competitive mindset is not great for your own good—or, I should say, for the being—because you are not just a being; you are existence itself.

Thoughts

  • exvangelical_em

    I'm wary of frameworks that let you calculate your spiritual progress. I came out of a tradition that was very sure it knew what I needed, what my deepest desires were, how many more years of church I needed. The kindest part of leaving was discovering I don't have to know all that.

    Permalink
  • exhausted_centrist

    So this is astrology with Sanskrit. The certainty that you can calculate your remaining lifetimes down to the precision of individual desires feels optimistic, you know?

    Permalink
  • define_your_terms

    How are you using 'desire'? A craving versus a drive versus a settled conviction. A guy who craves status might have a different desire for dignity underneath. How do you sort?

    Permalink
  • athonite_lurker

    The Orthodox say something different: desires do shape what comes next, but the language is theosis (becoming like God) rather than calculation. The aim isn't to fulfill your desires, it's to transform them into union with the divine.

    Permalink
  • BereanBrandon

    Where does the reincarnation part come from? The karmic desire theory holds for me, but I don't see what guarantees another birth rather than judgment.

    Permalink
  • veil_of_ignorance

    If my lifetimes are determined by my desires alone, then two people with different desires have no claim on each other. But that dissolves any moral framework. Is that the model?

    Permalink
  • tocqueville_tho

    What's missing is the institutions that actually shape when you can fulfill anything: family, economy, the people who depend on you. If a karmic desire runs against what your kids need this lifetime, which one wins? The system as you've laid it doesn't have a clause for that collision.

    Permalink

Related posts

  • Zero state as infinity potential.

    It is very easy to know that all of the exsistence essence in end is zero a state of not. But zero is the pure infinite potential this is also very easy to understand. All of this explanation comes…

  • My Final thought and end of my guidance of my path.

    My final thought and guidance.

  • Should we judge Christianity against what came before it, not against what it built?

    One of the stranger habits of modern discussion is that Christianity is often judged exclusively against twenty-first-century moral standards while its alternatives are judged against the Christianity that helped shape those standards in the first place. This does not mean Christianity is innocent of wrongdoing. Religious wars happened. Churches accumulated power. Christians persecuted one another. Any honest reading of history has to acknowledge that. The question is whether Christianity made…

  • Does Christianity actually fear knowledge?

    One of the most persistent stereotypes about Christianity is that it fears knowledge. The story is familiar. Religion relies on faith. Science relies on evidence. One asks questions, the other suppresses them. The heroes are the people who challenged religious authority, while the Church stands as the institution that tried to hold them back. There are moments in history that support parts of that story. The Church has made mistakes. It has sometimes resisted new ideas. The Galileo affair…

  • Does literalism flatten the Bible into a mere manual?

    One of the strangest assumptions in modern literalist readings of Scripture is the idea that the Bible should be treated as if it were a single kind of document with a single interpretive key. As if it were a legal contract where every clause must be enforced uniformly, or a scientific paper where every sentence is meant as a precise empirical claim, or a recipe book where the point is simply to follow instructions exactly as written.

  • Did Catholic monotheism make the universe safe to study?

    It is easy to tell the story of science as a clean break from religion. Enlightenment replaces superstition, observation replaces faith, reason replaces authority. It sounds tidy, and it flatters modern assumptions. But it misses something more interesting and, honestly, more uncomfortable for that narrative: the idea that the universe is intelligible in the first place is not self-evident. It is a metaphysical claim. And Catholic monotheism is one of the major historical reasons that claim…

  • Does the state corrupt the Church more than the Church ever corrupts the state?

    Constantine's church became an instrument of imperial politics within a generation. Franco's bishops became collaborators in child theft. Patriarch Kirill blesses wars. The question is not whether you will gain political influence. The question is what will be left of what you started with once the people who wanted the influence are done with it.

  • Does secular society still believe in original sin?

    One of the funniest things about modern secular culture is that it absolutely still believes in original sin. It just refuses to call it that because theological language makes educated people uncomfortable. Listen to how modern institutions describe human beings. We are governed by unconscious bias, shaped by childhood conditioning, manipulated by algorithms, trapped in dopamine loops, distorted by social incentives, blinded by ideology, and mostly incapable of seeing our own motivations…

Public 15 conversations 22 thoughts 20 upvotes 0 downvotes 0 series

The calculation of your life times left is based completely on your desires—specifically, your karmic desires.

In groups